Real PatriotPrinciples Over Preference

Actors

People and organizations across the U.S. government, scored on how well their real-world actions align with the five founding constitutional principles. Click any card to see per-action evidence. How we calculate this.

Closer to the principles+1 on a [-1, +1] scale. Closer to the founding principles.
Mixed signalAround 0 on a [-1, +1] scale. Mixed or neutral.
Farther from the principles-1 on a [-1, +1] scale. Farther from the founding principles.
Score = average per-principle alignment over weighted actions. +1 = consistently aligned, 0 = mixed, -1 = consistently in conflict.
354 entities· 227 low-confidenceLow-confidence entries are still shown but sorted to the bottom (Rule 4 \u2014 never hide an evidenced actor).

Timothy J. Smith

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#10 of 964Rank 10 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.83
Timothy J. Smith · +0.83 Closer to the principles 3.4σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #10 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Timothy J. Smith sits at +0.83 — about 3.4σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Feigin

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#62 of 964Rank 62 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.67
Feigin · +0.67 Closer to the principles 2.6σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #62 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Feigin sits at +0.67 — about 2.6σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Philip J. Weiser

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#79 of 964Rank 79 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.67
Philip J. Weiser · +0.67 Closer to the principles 2.6σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #79 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Philip J. Weiser sits at +0.67 — about 2.6σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Liz Cheney Hageman

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#93 of 964Rank 93 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Liz Cheney Hageman · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #93 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Liz Cheney Hageman sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Eric Shinseki

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#94 of 964Rank 94 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Eric Shinseki · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #94 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Eric Shinseki sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Brandon Weber

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#95 of 964Rank 95 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Brandon Weber · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #95 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Brandon Weber sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Kathleen Sebelius

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#96 of 964Rank 96 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Kathleen Sebelius · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #96 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Kathleen Sebelius sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#97 of 964Rank 97 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
(unnamed Person) · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #97 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Green of Texas

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#101 of 964Rank 101 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Mr. Green of Texas · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #101 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Green of Texas sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#107 of 964Rank 107 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
(unnamed Person) · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #107 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

President of the Senate

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#110 of 964Rank 110 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
President of the Senate · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #110 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

President of the Senate sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Yakym

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#116 of 964Rank 116 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Mr. Yakym · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #116 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Yakym sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Federal Procurement Policy Administrator

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#117 of 964Rank 117 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Federal Procurement Policy Administrator · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #117 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Federal Procurement Policy Administrator sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

To be determined

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#119 of 964Rank 119 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
To be determined · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #119 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

To be determined sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Lawler

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#140 of 964Rank 140 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Mr. Lawler · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #140 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Lawler sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#141 of 964Rank 141 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
(unnamed Person) · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #141 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#156 of 964Rank 156 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
(unnamed Person) · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #156 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

William McFarland

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#158 of 964Rank 158 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
William McFarland · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #158 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

William McFarland sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#159 of 964Rank 159 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #159 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Greg Steube

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#160 of 964Rank 160 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Greg Steube · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #160 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Greg Steube sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#161 of 964Rank 161 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
(unnamed Person) · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #161 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Catherine Szpindor

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#162 of 964Rank 162 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Catherine Szpindor · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #162 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Catherine Szpindor sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#164 of 964Rank 164 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
(unnamed Person) · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #164 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#169 of 964Rank 169 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
(unnamed Person) · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #169 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#172 of 964Rank 172 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #172 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Rob Wittman

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#173 of 964Rank 173 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Rob Wittman · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #173 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Rob Wittman sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#174 of 964Rank 174 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #174 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Deputy Administrator and Director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#176 of 964Rank 176 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Deputy Administrator and Director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #176 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Deputy Administrator and Director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 3 actions evaluated

#188 of 964Rank 188 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.22
(unnamed Person) · +0.22 Closer to the principles 0.6σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #188 of 964 Based on 3 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.22 — about 0.6σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Secretary of Veterans Affairs

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 2 actions evaluated

#208 of 964Rank 208 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.17
Secretary of Veterans Affairs · +0.17 Closer to the principles 0.3σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #208 of 964 Based on 2 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Secretary of Veterans Affairs sits at +0.17 — about 0.3σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →