Back to Actors

Deputy Administrator and Director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation

0.33Overall score on a [−1, +1] scale. +1 = consistently aligned with the principles; 0 = mixed; −1 = consistently in conflict.
High 0Evaluations marked high confidence — contributing signals agreed and evidence was strong.Med 3Evaluations marked medium confidence — signals mostly agreed; evidence present but not uniformly strong.Low 3Evaluations marked low confidence — signals disagreed or evidence was weak. Still shown, never hidden (Rule 4).50% lowShare of this entity’s evaluations that are low-confidence. High values warrant extra caution when reading the overall score.

Scores reflect how this entity’s real-world actions align with the Constitution’s core principles. Confidence shows how complete and consistent those evaluations are.

Evaluations

Showing 12 of 6 evaluations

Each card shows one real-world action evaluated against one constitutional principle.

Scores use a simple scale: +1 Upholds · 0 Mixed · −1 Violates.

Each score is generated by an automated system using prior recorded evaluations of this action; the underlying evidence and direction of those evaluations are shown, but individual authors are not recorded.

+1 UpholdsLow
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.rule_of_lawConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.
Low confidence: original signals disagreed

Summary

The bill establishes defined statutory criteria for coverage, payment, and cost-sharing exemptions with clear procedures for Secretary rulemaking and judicial review, consistent with rule-of-law requirements.

Reasoning

low confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

0 MixedMedium
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.equalityConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The bill applies uniform coverage rules to broadly defined at-risk categories, but the findings single out racial and ethnic disparities as motivation.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "The term at-risk beneficiary means an individual entitled to, or enrolled for, benefits under part A and enrolled for benefits under part B— (A) who is 65 years of age or older; (B) who is at least 50 years of age but not older than 64 years of age with risk factors for atherosclerosis"
  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "An estimated 21 million Americans have PAD, and about 200,000 of them—disproportionately minorities—suffer avoidable amputations every year as a result of such disease."

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0

+1 UpholdsHigh
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.consentConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

This is a bill introduced through ordinary legislative process in the House, which is the textbook form of governance by consent.

Reasoning

high confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "Mrs. McIver (for herself, Mr. Jackson of Illinois , and Ms. Kelly of Illinois ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means"
  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $6,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030."

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0

0 MixedLow
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.consentConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.
Low confidence: original signals disagreed

Summary

The bill follows standard legislative process (introduction, committee referral) but does not itself expand democratic participation or strengthen legislative oversight; it is a routine benefit-expansion measure within existing delegated authority.

Reasoning

low confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

0 MixedMedium
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.libertyConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The bill expands Medicare and Medicaid coverage of preventive screening tests without cost-sharing, which removes a financial barrier to medical access but does not directly restrict or enhance individual freedoms from government interference.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

+1 UpholdsHigh
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.rule_of_lawConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The bill works by amending specific sections of existing statutes with defined terms, effective dates, and procedural rules — classic rule-of-law drafting.

Reasoning

high confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2026."
  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "The term peripheral artery disease screening test means— (A) noninvasive physiologic studies of extremity arteries (commonly referred to as ankle-brachial index testing); (B) arterial duplex scans of lower extremity arteries vascular;"

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0

0 MixedMedium
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.minority_protectionConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The bill addresses a health disparity affecting minority populations but does not structurally constrict or protect a minority's access to rights, participation, or institutional standing relative to the majority.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

+1 UpholdsLow
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.equalityConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.
Low confidence: original signals disagreed

Summary

The bill applies the same screening coverage and cost-sharing exemption uniformly to all at-risk beneficiaries meeting defined clinical criteria, without singling out individuals or groups for differential treatment under the rule.

Reasoning

low confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

+1 UpholdsMedium
v2.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.limited_divided_powerConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

Backfilled v2.0.0: action supports the limited_divided_power principle (aggregated from 12 legacy actor_evaluation_scores rows).

Reasoning

Medium confidence: this score aggregates 12 contribution(s) with directionally consistent but not unanimous signals. Observed direction breakdown: toward=12, mixed=0, away=0, neutral=0. Observed mean alignment 7.83. Under Policy C methodology, the scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 from this contributor set.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government."

    Thomas Jefferson

Provenance (12 contributions)

Direction: toward=12, mixed=0, away=0, neutral=0, null=0

Alignment range: 78 (mean 7.83)

Methodology: 2.0.0

0 MixedLow
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.libertyConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.
Low confidence: original signals disagreed

Summary

The bill expands a health benefit but does not directly expand or restrict core liberties like speech, religion, or bodily autonomy.

Reasoning

low confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "peripheral artery disease screening tests furnished to at-risk beneficiaries (as such terms are defined in subsection (nnn))"

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0

0 MixedMedium
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.limited_divided_powerConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The bill operates within the existing federal Medicare and Medicaid framework and does not materially alter the separation of powers, checks and balances, or federalism balance.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

0 MixedMedium
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.limited_divided_powerConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

Congress writes the rules but also delegates definitional and standard-setting authority to the Secretary of HHS, producing a mixed separation-of-powers picture.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "such other items and services as the Secretary determines, in consultation with relevant stakeholders, to be appropriate for screening for peripheral artery disease for at-risk beneficiaries."
  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "Inapplicability The Secretarial authority described in paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to preventive services described in section 1861(ww)(2)(O)."

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0