Real PatriotPrinciples Over Preference
HomeBrowseActorsRankingsLearnEvaluateConsolePipelineSign In

Browse Actions

Every evaluated action across the Constitutional Evaluation Engine. Filter, sort, and dive into the evidence.

These scores are Phase-2 legacy importsLoaded from our prior scoring system (actor_evaluation_scores) into the new rp_principle_evaluation table in Phase 2. See /methodology#caution for the full mapping., not live evaluations.

Every score below came from our previous system’s records, not from the live constitutional evaluator. They carry "low" or "medium" confidence labels by design — no row will show "high" confidence until Phase 3.3 re-evaluation completes. Individual row banners add more detail on a per-evaluation basis. Why this matters.

·····561 awaiting evaluationThese documents have been ingested into the system but are still being processed through the evaluation pipeline. The count will decrease as evaluations complete.
Type
Branch
Score legend: +1 moves toward a principle · 0A score of 0 is honest: sometimes an action has effects that balance across this principle (e.g., expands and limits liberty in different ways), and sometimes we genuinely don't have clear evidence yet. Hover any card's score badge for the evaluator's specific reasoning. means the action is balanced across this principle, OR we found no clear evidence either way — hover for detail · −1 moves away from a principle.|Confidence legend: high (strong evidence) · medium (some evidence) · low (limited evidence — interpret with caution). Learn how we score →

§6 Minority Protection now evaluated on all 991 actions (v=3.1)

Recently Evaluated

The most recent actions with at least one principle scored.

All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightMay 25, 2023
Tyler v. Hennepin County

Tyler v. Hennepin County

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.71
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 23 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 26, 2024
Murthy v. Missouri Revisions: 6/26/24

Murthy v. Missouri Revisions: 6/26/24

Mixed signal

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.07
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most contributors had low confidence (64%). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 18 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightNov 1, 2018
Blocking Property of Additional Persons Contributi

Blocking Property of Additional Persons Contributi

Farther from the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
-0.33
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most contributors had low confidence (89%). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.1.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 12 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
New York v. New Jersey

The Supreme Court's decision in New York v. New Jersey reinforces the principle of state sovereignty and the contractual nature of interstate compacts. By allowing New Jersey to unilaterally withdraw from the Waterfront Commission Compact, the Court upheld the foundational idea that states retain significant authority over their agreements, provided they do not explicitly restrict withdrawal.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.45
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 12, 2025
Commissioner v. Zuch

Commissioner v. Zuch

Mixed signal

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Text — Not enough primary-source content was available to fully evaluate this action. Score should be read with caution.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Text — Not enough primary-source content was available to fully evaluate this action. Score should be read with caution.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Text — Not enough primary-source content was available to fully evaluate this action. Score should be read with caution.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Text — Not enough primary-source content was available to fully evaluate this action. Score should be read with caution.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Text — Not enough primary-source content was available to fully evaluate this action. Score should be read with caution.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Text — Not enough primary-source content was available to fully evaluate this action. Score should be read with caution.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most contributors had low confidence (69%). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 17 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightMay 16, 2024
Smith v. Spizzirri

Smith v. Spizzirri

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.33
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Material — The source corpus for this action was too thin for confident scoring.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Material — The source corpus for this action was too thin for confident scoring.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Material — The source corpus for this action was too thin for confident scoring.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Material — The source corpus for this action was too thin for confident scoring.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Material — The source corpus for this action was too thin for confident scoring.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Insufficient Source Material — The source corpus for this action was too thin for confident scoring.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most contributors had low confidence (75%). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 15 total citationsHow was this scored? →

Latest Bills

Newest bills from Congress, ranked by date.

All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.BillBill: proposed law introduced in Congress.LegislativeLegislative Branch: passed by Congress (House or Senate).CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act

{ "overallScore": 8, "status": "good", "summary": "The Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act aligns with the constitutional commitment to support veterans and promote their welfare. By excluding service-connected disability compensation from income calculations, it seeks to enhance housing accessibility for disabled veterans, reflecting the principles of equality and support for those who have served.", "constitutionalIssues": [ { "principle": "Equal Protection", "analysi

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.56
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 9 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.BillBill: proposed law introduced in Congress.LegislativeLegislative Branch: passed by Congress (House or Senate).CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Health Care Affordability Act of 2025

The Health Care Affordability Act of 2025 seeks to expand eligibility for health care credits, aligning with the constitutional power of Congress to regulate commerce and promote the general welfare. However, concerns arise regarding the potential overreach of federal authority and the implications for state rights in health care regulation.

Mixed signal

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.09
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.BillBill: proposed law introduced in Congress.LegislativeLegislative Branch: passed by Congress (House or Senate).CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 80 Prospect Street in Avon, New York, as the "Officer Anthony Mazurkiewicz Memorial Post Office Building".

The designation of a postal facility in honor of Officer Anthony Mazurkiewicz aligns with the constitutional powers of Congress to establish post offices and promote the general welfare. This action reflects a recognition of public service and sacrifice, consistent with founding principles of honoring those who serve the community.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.27
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.BillBill: proposed law introduced in Congress.LegislativeLegislative Branch: passed by Congress (House or Senate).CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Advanced Border Coordination Act of 2025

The Advanced Border Coordination Act of 2025 seeks to enhance collaboration among federal, state, local, and tribal agencies at the southern border, which aligns with the federal government's responsibility to ensure national security. However, concerns may arise regarding the potential overreach of federal authority and the implications for state sovereignty.

Farther from the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
-0.22
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score33 concerns flagged: Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 9 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.BillBill: proposed law introduced in Congress.LegislativeLegislative Branch: passed by Congress (House or Senate).CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Electing Members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives.

The resolution to elect members to various standing committees of the House of Representatives aligns well with the constitutional framework, as it reflects the legislative authority granted to Congress. This action upholds the principle of representative democracy and the separation of powers.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.55
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.BillBill: proposed law introduced in Congress.LegislativeLegislative Branch: passed by Congress (House or Senate).CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in Lubbock, Texas, as the "General Bernie Mittemeyer VA Clinic".

{ "overallScore": 8, "status": "good", "summary": "The legislative action to name a VA clinic after General Bernie Mittemeyer aligns with the constitutional powers of Congress to designate names for federal properties. This action reflects respect for military service and honors veterans, which is consistent with the founding principles of valuing service and sacrifice.", "constitutionalIssues": [ { "principle": "Legislative Authority", "analysis": "The U.S. Constitution

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.45
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. retroactive_pattern_d_downgrade — Flag key not yet in label map. The evaluator emitted this flag but the UI hasn’t been taught its human-readable meaning yet.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. retroactive_pattern_d_downgrade — Flag key not yet in label map. The evaluator emitted this flag but the UI hasn’t been taught its human-readable meaning yet.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. retroactive_pattern_d_downgrade — Flag key not yet in label map. The evaluator emitted this flag but the UI hasn’t been taught its human-readable meaning yet.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. retroactive_pattern_d_downgrade — Flag key not yet in label map. The evaluator emitted this flag but the UI hasn’t been taught its human-readable meaning yet.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect. retroactive_pattern_d_downgrade — Flag key not yet in label map. The evaluator emitted this flag but the UI hasn’t been taught its human-readable meaning yet.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →

Latest Executive Orders

Recent executive directives, ranked by signing date.

All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 3, 2026
Urgent National Action To Save College Sports

Urgent National Action To Save College Sports

Mixed signal

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score—
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score—
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Methodology v=2.0.0 · Scored Apr 17, 2026 · 2 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightMar 31, 2026
Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal E

Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal E

Mixed signal

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score—
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score—
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score—
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most contributors had low confidence (100%). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=2.0.0 · Scored Apr 17, 2026 · 3 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightMar 26, 2026
Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors

Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors

Farther from the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
-0.31
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score44 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score44 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score44 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score44 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score44 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score44 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Original Understanding Concern — The constitutional interpretation extends beyond what the founders documented. Not necessarily wrong, but worth noticing. Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required. Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 20 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightMar 24, 2026
Further Continuance of the Federal Emergency Management Agen

Further Continuance of the Federal Emergency Management Agen

Mixed signal

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.08
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 14 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightMar 24, 2026
Further Continuance of the Federal Emergency Manag

Further Continuance of the Federal Emergency Manag

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+1.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score—
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.—Not yet evaluated on this principle. Only principles with sufficient evidence are scored.——
Methodology v=2.0.0 · Scored Apr 17, 2026 · 1 total citationHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightMar 20, 2026
Preserving America's Game

Preserving America's Game

Farther from the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
-0.25
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Insufficient Text — Legacy data-quality key (same meaning as Insufficient Source Text).
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Insufficient Text — Legacy data-quality key (same meaning as Insufficient Source Text).
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Insufficient Text — Legacy data-quality key (same meaning as Insufficient Source Text).
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Insufficient Text — Legacy data-quality key (same meaning as Insufficient Source Text).
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Insufficient Text — Legacy data-quality key (same meaning as Insufficient Source Text).
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot. Insufficient Text — Legacy data-quality key (same meaning as Insufficient Source Text).
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most contributors had low confidence (58%). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 16 total citationsHow was this scored? →

Latest Court Rulings

Recent federal court rulings, ranked by decision date.

All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Allen v. Milligan

The Supreme Court's decision in Allen v. Milligan reinforces the protections against racial discrimination in voting as outlined in the Voting Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause. By affirming the lower court's ruling that Alabama's districting plan likely violated these protections, the Court upholds the foundational principle of equal representation under the law.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.82
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Kennedy

The Supreme Court's decision in Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Kennedy clarifies the interpretation of 'entitled to SSI benefits' within the context of Medicare funding. By affirming that entitlement is based on monthly eligibility, the ruling aligns with the principles of clarity and fairness in the administration of federal health programs.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.27
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters

The Supreme Court's decision in Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters reinforces the principle that while workers have the right to strike, this right is not absolute and must be exercised with consideration for the property rights of employers. The ruling emphasizes the need for reasonable precautions to prevent foreseeable harm during labor disputes, aligning with foundational principles of property rights and the balance of power between labor and management.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.27
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA

The Supreme Court's decision in Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA affirms the standing of fuel producers to challenge EPA's approval of California's emissions regulations under the Clean Air Act. This ruling highlights the tension between state regulatory authority and federal oversight, reflecting ongoing debates about environmental policy and economic impact.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.27
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Percoco v. United States

The Supreme Court's decision in Percoco v. United States clarifies the boundaries of honest-services fraud, particularly concerning the duties of private citizens in relation to public service. While the ruling aligns with the principle of legal clarity, it also raises questions about the accountability of individuals who exert significant influence over government actions without formal public office.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.18
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightApr 14, 2026
Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L. P.

The Supreme Court's decision in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners clarifies the interpretation of Rule 10b-5(b) regarding omissions in securities law, reinforcing the principle that silence alone does not constitute fraud unless it renders affirmative statements misleading. This ruling aligns with foundational principles of protecting investors while maintaining a clear standard for liability.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
+0.27
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Methodology v=3.0.0 · Scored Apr 24, 2026 · 11 total citationsHow was this scored? →

Evaluate Your Own Content

Submit any legislation, executive order, or policy proposal for non-partisan constitutional evaluation against the five co-equal constitutional principles.

Start Evaluation
About this page

System Health

Actions evaluated1,991
Non-low confidence1,312
Actions with at least one high or medium confidence principle.
Methodology3.1.0
Last refreshApr 24, 2026, 06:19 PM

Principle Spotlight

  • Limited & Divided Power1,884
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Rule of Law1,057
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Liberty757
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Equality Before the Law698
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Consent604
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.

Based on all evaluations

Quick Links

  • How we score
  • Our 6 principles
  • Rankings
  • Compare
  • Test yourself

System Health

Actions evaluated1,991
Non-low confidence1,312
Actions with at least one high or medium confidence principle.
Methodology3.1.0
Last refreshApr 24, 2026, 06:19 PM

Principle Spotlight

  • Limited & Divided Power1,884
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Rule of Law1,057
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Liberty757
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Equality Before the Law698
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Consent604
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.

Based on all evaluations

Quick Links

  • How we score
  • Our 6 principles
  • Rankings
  • Compare
  • Test yourself
The Six Principles·How It Works·Who Scores

Real Patriot — Principles Over Preference

We apply the same standard to everyone.