Real PatriotPrinciples Over Preference

Rankings

How government actors and institutions align with the six founding constitutional principles. Every score is backed by specific documented actions. How we calculate this.

Closer to the principles+1 on a [-1, +1] scale. Closer to the founding principles.
Mixed signalAround 0 on a [-1, +1] scale. Mixed or neutral.
Farther from the principles-1 on a [-1, +1] scale. Farther from the founding principles.
Score = average per-principle alignment over weighted actions. +1 = consistently aligned, 0 = mixed, -1 = consistently in conflict.✓ §6 Minority Protection now evaluated on all 991 actions (v=3.1)
964 entities· 731 low-confidenceLow-confidence entries are still shown but sorted to the bottom (Rule 4 — never hide an evidenced actor).

Timothy J. Smith

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#10 of 964Rank 10 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.83
Timothy J. Smith · +0.83 Closer to the principles 3.4σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #10 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Timothy J. Smith sits at +0.83 — about 3.4σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Timothy Smith

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#11 of 964Rank 11 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.83
Timothy Smith · +0.83 Closer to the principles 3.4σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #11 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Timothy Smith sits at +0.83 — about 3.4σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Feigin

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#62 of 964Rank 62 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.67
Feigin · +0.67 Closer to the principles 2.6σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #62 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Feigin sits at +0.67 — about 2.6σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Philip J. Weiser

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#79 of 964Rank 79 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.67
Philip J. Weiser · +0.67 Closer to the principles 2.6σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #79 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Philip J. Weiser sits at +0.67 — about 2.6σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Colorado Court of Appeals

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#81 of 964Rank 81 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.67
Colorado Court of Appeals · +0.67 Closer to the principles 2.6σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #81 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Colorado Court of Appeals sits at +0.67 — about 2.6σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Colorado State

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#83 of 964Rank 83 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.67
Colorado State · +0.67 Closer to the principles 2.6σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #83 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Colorado State sits at +0.67 — about 2.6σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Ms. Hageman

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#91 of 964Rank 91 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Ms. Hageman · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #91 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Ms. Hageman sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Liz Cheney Hageman

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#93 of 964Rank 93 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Liz Cheney Hageman · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #93 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Liz Cheney Hageman sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Eric Shinseki

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#94 of 964Rank 94 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Eric Shinseki · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #94 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Eric Shinseki sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Brandon Weber

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#95 of 964Rank 95 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Brandon Weber · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #95 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Brandon Weber sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Kathleen Sebelius

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#96 of 964Rank 96 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Kathleen Sebelius · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #96 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Kathleen Sebelius sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#97 of 964Rank 97 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
(unnamed Person) · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #97 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Green of Texas

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#101 of 964Rank 101 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Mr. Green of Texas · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #101 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Green of Texas sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#107 of 964Rank 107 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
(unnamed Person) · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #107 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Messmer

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#108 of 964Rank 108 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Mr. Messmer · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #108 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Messmer sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

President of the Senate

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#110 of 964Rank 110 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
President of the Senate · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #110 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

President of the Senate sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#114 of 964Rank 114 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #114 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Yakym

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#116 of 964Rank 116 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Mr. Yakym · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #116 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Yakym sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Federal Procurement Policy Administrator

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#117 of 964Rank 117 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Federal Procurement Policy Administrator · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #117 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Federal Procurement Policy Administrator sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

To be determined

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#119 of 964Rank 119 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
To be determined · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #119 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

To be determined sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Weber of Texas

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#120 of 964Rank 120 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.50
Mr. Weber of Texas · +0.50 Closer to the principles 1.9σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #120 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Weber of Texas sits at +0.50 — about 1.9σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Covered Federal Agencies

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#137 of 964Rank 137 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Covered Federal Agencies · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #137 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Covered Federal Agencies sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Bergman

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#138 of 964Rank 138 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Mr. Bergman · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #138 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Bergman sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Fong

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#139 of 964Rank 139 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Mr. Fong · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #139 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Fong sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Mr. Lawler

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#140 of 964Rank 140 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Mr. Lawler · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #140 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Mr. Lawler sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

(unnamed Person)

PersonEntity kind: Person. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#141 of 964Rank 141 of 964 persons in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
(unnamed Person) · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #141 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

(unnamed Person) sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Indian Tribes

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#143 of 964Rank 143 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Indian Tribes · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #143 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Indian Tribes sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Amtrak

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#146 of 964Rank 146 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Amtrak · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #146 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Amtrak sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Committee on Veterans' Affairs

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#150 of 964Rank 150 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Committee on Veterans' Affairs · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #150 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Committee on Veterans' Affairs sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →

Committee on Armed Services

OrganizationEntity kind: Organization. Window: Lifetime.Lifetime· 1 action evaluated

#151 of 964Rank 151 of 964 organizations in the current view, sorted by overall alignment score.

Closer to the principles

Wong palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNeeds rp_actor.party_key — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor state + district — Phase 4.2Needs rp_actor_committee_membership — Phase 4.2
Alignment range [−1, +1]. Vermillion = farther, blue = closer. Colorblind-safe.
−2σ ≈ -0.35 · ~2.5% of actors score below this
−2σ
−1σ ≈ -0.13 · ~84% score above this
−1σ
Median All actors: 0.00. 50% score above, 50% below.
med
Mean All actors: +0.09 (weighted by action count).
mean
+1σ ≈ +0.31 · ~16% score above this
+1σ
+2σ ≈ +0.53 · ~2.5% score above this. Extreme tail.
+2σ
+0.33
Committee on Armed Services · +0.33 Closer to the principles 1.1σ above the all-actors mean Rank: #151 of 964 Based on 1 evaluated actions
−1 farther0+1 closer

Committee on Armed Services sits at +0.33 — about 1.1σ above the all-actors mean (+0.09). Distribution ticks show the full population: roughly two-thirds of actors fall between -1σ and +1σ.

How was this scored? →