Back to Actors

Kathleen Sebelius

0.50Overall score on a [−1, +1] scale. +1 = consistently aligned with the principles; 0 = mixed; −1 = consistently in conflict.
High 0Evaluations marked high confidence — contributing signals agreed and evidence was strong.Med 5Evaluations marked medium confidence — signals mostly agreed; evidence present but not uniformly strong.Low 1Evaluations marked low confidence — signals disagreed or evidence was weak. Still shown, never hidden (Rule 4).16.67% lowShare of this entity’s evaluations that are low-confidence. High values warrant extra caution when reading the overall score.

Scores reflect how this entity’s real-world actions align with the Constitution’s core principles. Confidence shows how complete and consistent those evaluations are.

Evaluations

Showing 12 of 6 evaluations

Each card shows one real-world action evaluated against one constitutional principle.

Scores use a simple scale: +1 Upholds · 0 Mixed · −1 Violates.

Each score is generated by an automated system using prior recorded evaluations of this action; the underlying evidence and direction of those evaluations are shown, but individual authors are not recorded.

+1 UpholdsMedium
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.rule_of_lawConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The order invokes existing legal authority, sets defined deadlines, measurable metrics, and reporting requirements — all hallmarks of procedural regularity.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order as follows"
  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "The Task Force shall define specific goals and metrics that will aid in measuring progress in improving mental health strategies."

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0

0 MixedMedium
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.limited_divided_powerConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The action is an executive order addressing benefits administration, a domain where executive authority is well-established, but the absence of visible statutory delegation creates ambiguity about whether the action rests on enumerated executive power or general executive prerogative.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

+1 UpholdsMedium
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.rule_of_lawConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The action establishes a defined policy objective (expanding mental health access) that is subject to judicial review and administrative procedure, consistent with rule-of-law transparency and reviewability.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

0 MixedMedium
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.minority_protectionConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The action targets veterans as a beneficiary class for expanded services, which does not constrict any minority's structural footing or participation rights; it expands access to a benefit.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

0 MixedMedium
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.limited_divided_powerConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The order coordinates existing executive branch agencies through a task force but does not concentrate new authority or bypass other branches.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority [context] granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals."

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0

0 MixedLow
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.equalityConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.
Low confidence: original signals disagreed

Summary

The order targets a defined beneficiary class — veterans, service members, and military families — which is a longstanding statutory category rather than a novel preference.

Reasoning

low confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "Ensuring that all veterans, service members (Active, Guard, and Reserve alike), and their families receive the support they deserve is a top priority for my Administration."

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0

0 MixedLow
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.consentConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.
Low confidence: original signals disagreed

Summary

The action is an executive order issued by an unelected executive official without explicit statutory delegation visible in the available text, placing it one step removed from direct democratic authorization.

Reasoning

low confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

+1 UpholdsMedium
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.equalityConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The action targets a defined class (veterans) for expanded service access, which is a permissible classification when the government provides a benefit to a subset of the population based on relevant status.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

0 MixedLow
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.libertyConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.
Low confidence: original signals disagreed

Summary

The order expands voluntary mental health services for veterans and military families but does not compel participation or restrict individual rights.

Reasoning

low confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 0 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States"

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0

+1 UpholdsMedium
v3.1.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.libertyConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The action expands access to mental health services for veterans, enhancing individual autonomy and well-being without restricting personal freedoms or imposing new constraints on bodily autonomy or medical choice.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 at backfill time. Methodology 3.1.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.1.0

+1 UpholdsMedium
v3.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.consentConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

The order operates within existing statutory authority and conditions all action on available appropriations — meaning Congress retains the power of the purse.

Reasoning

medium confidence: insufficient contributor detail available for this evaluation. The underlying rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id, so per-direction and per-alignment breakdowns cannot be reconstructed. The scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 at backfill time. Methodology 3.0.0.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations."
  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "The Task Force will include cost analysis in the development of all recommendations, and will ensure any new requirements are supported within existing resources."

Contributor detail unavailable

rp_backfill_source_map has no contributor rows for this PE id; breakdown and ranges cannot be reconstructed.

Methodology: 3.0.0

+1 UpholdsMedium
v2.0.0Methodology version used to produce this score. Different versions are not directly comparable — see /methodology for the changelog.limited_divided_powerConstitutional principle scored. Raw key — see /methodology for the full definition and the other four principles.

Summary

Backfilled v2.0.0: action supports the limited_divided_power principle (aggregated from 12 legacy actor_evaluation_scores rows).

Reasoning

Medium confidence: this score aggregates 11 contribution(s) with directionally consistent but not unanimous signals. Observed direction breakdown: toward=11, mixed=0, away=0, neutral=0. Observed mean alignment 8.27. Under Policy C methodology, the scoring pipeline resolved the final score to 1 from this contributor set.

Evidence

  • primary_officialEvidence tier. Primary sources are official records. Secondary are reputable analyses. Commentary and AI-inferred can never be primary.
    "The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government."

    Thomas Jefferson

Provenance (11 contributions)

Direction: toward=11, mixed=0, away=0, neutral=0, null=0

Alignment range: 79 (mean 8.27)

Methodology: 2.0.0